tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2596401113331676766.post8988398490799998347..comments2023-04-27T08:34:23.294-04:00Comments on Bubba's Bangin' Batch of Baseball Bits: Allen & Ginter Insert Overview Series #93Bubbahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11062079159673852999noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2596401113331676766.post-85924196234068214442015-05-25T11:19:16.616-04:002015-05-25T11:19:16.616-04:00Oh, I would agree as far as their intention. I ju...Oh, I would agree as far as their intention. I just feel that it didn't come across as such and was simply way over the top and unnecessary. As far as the Ginter Code goes... I'm just going to maintain the assumption that nothing is for the Ginter Code because it's easier for me to do. I haven't ever tried to even briefly look into breaking the Code. I'm perfectly fine with Topps doing it, but I also think that it should probably have minimal to no impact on set design (i.e. leaving a number off a card... fine, changing the number of a card... fine, changing the color scheme of a set... not fine). Not saying Topps necessarily does any of these things for the Ginter Code (cough... Desmond Jennings... cough) but I'm just trying to give you an idea of my thinking. Bubbahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11062079159673852999noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2596401113331676766.post-67801988101109837902015-05-25T09:09:33.187-04:002015-05-25T09:09:33.187-04:00I'm with you on the design of the card, but I ...I'm with you on the design of the card, but I think that the picture on the bottom of the front of the card is intended to reflect the old-school fairs or even World's Fairs with the Ferris Wheel as the main attraction rather than a theme park. Still, that design feature was really unnecessary (unless it was necessary for the Ginter Code).Tony L.https://www.blogger.com/profile/01349226671097456632noreply@blogger.com